ENEM

ITA

IME

FUVEST

UNICAMP

UNESP

UNIFESP

UFPR

UFRGS

UNB

VestibularEdição do vestibular
Disciplina

(FGV - 2018/1)GAMETESBy Kristin A. Hook[1] Most se

Inglês | condition
Inglês | text interpretation
FGV 2018FGV InglêsTurma ENEM Kuadro

(FGV - 2018/1)

GAMETES

By Kristin A. Hook

[1]    Most sexual organisms — be they bacteria, fungi, plants, or animals — have only two mating types: females and males. Females are defined by their ability to produce eggs, males by their ability to produce sperm. In distinguishing between those two types of gametes, size matters most. The union of a sperm, the small gamete, with an egg, the large gamete, characterizes sexual reproduction. But how did these two gamete types come to be?

[2] One theory suggests that before females or males existed, all gametes were the same type and size. What size? A larger gamete offers more nutrition to a developing offspring [prole], assuring a higher chance of survival. Natural selection would thus favor all gametes to be large. But this is not what happened.


[3] Efficiency also pays off in the gamete world. Large gametes are less efficient at finding a mate precisely because their size obliges them to be fewer in number. On the other hand, the smaller gametes invest their resources into being more abundant. Occurring in greater numbers means they are much more likely to encounter their target.

[4] Clearly, there are advantages for both large and small gametes. To reconcile how we ended up with both types, let’s imagine the potential pairings of these different gamete types from the perspective of natural selection. In a remarkable achievement, suppose two large gametes find one another. Sure, the fusion of their genetic material will result in a mighty super-survivor offspring because of their investments being large, equal, and nutritious. Unfortunately for them, however, their big investments will come at the expense of being rare, so these unions will result in fewer offspring. Likewise, though the union of two small gametes would be more probable given their abundance, neither gamete can provide sufficient nutrition for the offspring to survive. Consequently, neither of these unions between like gametes would be favored over time.

[5] Because of this disparity in size, sexual evolution also involves a story of parasitism. Here’s how it works: by favoring both egg and sperm, natural selection ensured unequal contributions from the gametes to the offspring. While large gametes evolved for nourishment of the offspring, small gametes became lazy, so to speak, since they didn’t have to provide any of the nourishment for the offspring. Just like a parasite, a sperm cell will exploit the resources of an egg.

Adapted from Natural History, November 2014.

With respect to the hypothetical union of two small gametes (as presented in paragraph 4), which of the following is not mentioned”?

A

Even if a sexual organism’s eggs and sperm were both small, there would still only be one egg and many sperm.

B

With the passage of time, natural selection would tend to reduce the occurrence of that type of union.

C

That type of union would probably be more common than the union of two large gametes.

D

Compared to the union of two large gametes, the union of two smaller gametes would be both more efficient and less successful.

E

Although that type of union could occur in relative abundance, the offspring would not survive.