ENEM

ITA

IME

FUVEST

UNICAMP

UNESP

UNIFESP

UFPR

UFRGS

UNB

VestibularEdição do vestibular
Disciplina

(IME - 2018/2019 - 2 FASE)PARA AS QUESTES 31 A 33,

(IME - 2018/2019 - 2ª FASE)

PARA AS QUESTÕES 31 A 33, RESPONDA DE ACORDO COM O TEXTO 2 A SEGUIR.

Texto 2

CORPORATE CONTROL AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE OF MARINE GENETIC RESOURCES

INTRODUCTION
The prospect of the ocean generating a new era of “blue growth” is increasingly finding its way into national and international policy documents around the world and has spurred a rush to claim ocean space and resources. If economic activities in coastal and offshore areas are to expand in an equitable and sustainable manner, in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), progress is needed toward addressing multiple and potentially conflicting uses of ocean space within national jurisdictions, in addition to developing a consistent and transparent legal framework for the vast areas beyond national  jurisdiction (ABNJ). These areas cover 64% of the world’s ocean and 47% of the Earth’s surface yet remain poorly understood or described. Marine organisms have evolved to thrive in the extremes of pressure, temperature, chemistry, and darkness found in the ocean, resulting in unique adaptations that make them the object of commercial interest, particularly for biomedical and industrial applications. By 2025, the global market for marine biotechnology is projected to reach $6.4 billion, spanning a broad range of commercial purposes for the pharmaceutical, biofuel, and chemical industries. One way to ensure exclusive access to these potential economic benefits is through patents associated with “marine genetic resources” (MGRs). Although the term MGRs has never been formally described, it suggests a subset of “genetic resources”, which have been defined under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) as “genetic material of actual or potential value”.____________________. The adoption of the Nagoya Protocol in 2010 represented an important step within the international policy arena to define obligations associated with monetary and nonmonetary benefit sharing of genetic resources and their products sourced from within national jurisdictions. No such mechanism currently exists for ABNJ.

 ( . . . )

BLASIAK, R.; JOUFFRAY, JB.; WABNITZ, C.; SUNDSTROM, E. e OSTERBLOM, H. Adaptado de Corporate contro and global governance of marine genetic resources. In: Science Advances. Disponível em <http://advances.sciencemag.org/ content/4/6/eaar5237.full>. Acesso em: 07/08/2018.

 

Choose the appropriate continuation for “Although the term MGRs has never been formally described, it suggests a subset of ‘genetic resources,’ which have been defined under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) as ‘genetic material of actual or potential value’.”

A

However, their substantial financial resources enable them to develop commercial applications despite uncertain timelines and returns on investment.
 

B

Past research has focused on countries where patents have been registered rather than the individual actors registering them.

C

Because of this, transnational corporations have a unique ability to capitalize on and monopolize markets characterized by global scope and complexity.

D

The registration of patent claims involving such resources constitutes an opaque and rapidly evolving frontier where the worlds of science, policy, and industry meet.

E

This facilitates the acquisition or collection of samples, for example, chartering vessels for a week-long sampling cruise of deep-water corals estimated in 2013 at $455,000.