(ITA - 2001 - 1a Fase)WALKINGSWINNERS AND LOSERSI.

(ITA - 2001 - 1a Fase)

WALKING'S
WINNERS AND LOSERS

I. Postosuchus. Producers kept scene of the predator urinating - even though its closest relatives all excrete urea, not urine.

II. Diplodocus. Herds look so heavy you can almost feel the ground shake. First time animated with frill on spine.

III. Cynodonts. Squat mammal ancestors sport convincing fur and behaviors. Bonus points for calling them "mammal-like reptiles".

IV. Coatimundi. Cameo by this modern American mammal is totally out of place; its ancestors were never in Antarctica or Australia.

V. Pterosaurs. They fly like aces, but it's the ground-walking that really wows. Insulating fuzz on wings is accurate.

VI. Marine reptiles. Cousteau would have loved graceful ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs. Realistic birth scene.

 

O quadro faz menção a pontos fortes e a pontos fracos observados pela crítica no documentário "Caminhando com Dinossauros", classificando-os de "winners" (os pontos fortes) e "losers" (os pontos fracos). Analise o quadro e aponte, pelo contexto da crítica, se cada um dos itens, numerados de I a VI, é um "winner" ou um "loser".